A provenance file is built one source at a time: a label on the back of a canvas, a lot number in a 1937 sale catalogue, an entry in a dealer’s stock book, a name in a restitution claim. The sources are scattered across libraries and databases, written in several languages, often digitised as images rather than text. The slow part is not judgement; it is finding and reading.
So the system does the finding and reading. Given an object’s record and what is already known, it searches digitised sale catalogues, archives you have access to and the databases a researcher would check, such as the German Lost Art Foundation’s database, the Art Loss Register and the Interpol stolen works of art database where you hold access, and returns candidate matches. Each comes with the source, the page and the reason it might match, for the researcher to confirm or reject.
The output is a timeline in which every step is either cited and confirmed by a person, or marked as a gap. Gaps are never smoothed over, least of all in the 1933–1945 period, where the Washington Conference Principles set expectations for research and transparency.